Instructions:
1. There are 10 sections to this questionnaire. Each section
corresponds to the 10 Key Values of the Green Party.
2. Each section contains one or more written questions and ends with
several multiple-choice questions. Please don't skip the written
questions.
3. The multiple-choice questions are answered by checking the box in the
appropriate column to indicate which is closest to your position:
+ = Support / Agree / Yes
- = Oppose / Disagree / No
: = Undecided / Don't know / No opinion
4. The world is too complex to always break down neatly into
yes/no/maybe choices, so feel free to clarify any answers to multiple
choice questions with a few words.
Candidate Name: Pearci "PJ" Bastiany III
Phone Number: 415-610-3551
Web site: https://bastiany-campaign-site--mafhssf.replit.app/
E-mail: mafhssf@gmail.com
Name of Campaign Manager: Erica Moseley
Are you receiving public financing?: No, missed the deadline
Signed voluntary spending limit?: No
2nd, 3rd endorsements in District: None
Major Endorsements: AlphaPAC, Moms Demand Gun Sense Candidate
Incumbent Supervisor whose votes are most similar to the way you would
vote: Supervisor Bilal Mahmood
Incumbent who votes least similarly to the way you would vote: Supervisor
Matt Dorsey
If the election were held today, who would you support as Board President?:
Supervisor Bilal Mahmood
Who would be your second and third choices: 2nd choice Supervisor Jackie
Fielder, 3rd choice Supervisor Myrna Melgar
Who did you endorse for Mayor in 2024 (all 3 choices, if applicable)?: I
gave SF Mayor Breed my sole vote. I will say the 2024 cycle was my last
cycle as an official Democrat. I'm a free agent now, looking for a tribe
where I can call out the Genocide in Gaza without being gaslit.
1) Grassroots Democracy:
A) What are your thoughts on Instant Runoff Voting, and District
Elections? How have they worked to date? What would you change in
the future? What about Proportional Representation?
I like the concept of ranked choice voting because it can broaden voter
expression and encourage coalition-building, but I think it can be
problematic in off-presidential cycles when turnout is very low. In those
elections, the method can produce results that do not feel fully
representative of the broader electorate, especially when participation is
weak.
For district elections, I would prefer a week-long voting period that gives
more constituents time to participate and use ballot boxes. I would also
support a higher voter-engagement threshold, roughly 30 to 40 percent, so
the count continues until there is enough participation to make the result
feel like a true quorum of the district, similar to how a business meeting
needs enough people present to make major decisions.
I am also against recall elections except in cases involving serious
misconduct or criminal conduct warranting removal. If voters elect someone
to a term, that person should generally be allowed to finish the term
unless there is a truly extraordinary reason to remove them, because
frequent recalls waste taxpayer money, destabilize leadership, and can
reduce government effectiveness for the people it serves.
+ - ?
[ + ] [ ] [ ] Sub-government such as Neighborhood Assemblies,
Networks or District Councils
[ ] [ - ] [ ] Voters' right to recall elected officials
[ + ] [ ] [ ] Residency requirements for elected officials
should be strictly enforced
B) What strategies would you employ to reduce corruption in San
Francisco government?
To reduce corruption in San Francisco government, I would focus on
transparency, public accountability, and reducing the influence of wealth
over policy. That means televising Ethics Commission meetings,
strengthening whistleblower protections, expanding access to contracting
and ethics information, and making it easier for residents to see how
decisions are made and who is benefiting from them.
I would prioritize investigations into violations by well-funded campaigns
and political networks, because corruption often hides behind polished
messaging, consultant networks, and moneyed influence. I do not support
Super PACs shaping city politics, and I believe the city should be much
more skeptical of developer-aligned political ecosystems and any campaign
activity that blurs the line between civic engagement and pay-to-play
politics.
I also support remote public comment at board and committee meetings,
because participation should not depend on who can physically appear at
City Hall. In addition, I want to see a stronger connection between city
government and the academic field of public administration, including a
real pipeline from USF and SFSU MPA programs into city service roles,
advisory relationships with public administration faculty, and clearer
pathways into internships, fellowships, analyst positions, and long-term
public service careers.
+ - ?
[ ] [ - ] [ ] Ethics Commission should be disbanded
[ + ] [ ] [ ] Ethics Commission meetings should be televised
[ + ] [ ] [ ] Ethics Commission should prioritize
investigating violations from well-funded campaigns
[ ] [ - ] [ ] My campaign is supported or promoted by a Super
PAC
[ + ] [ ] [ ] My campaign has attended events sponsored by
"Neighbors for a Better SF", "TogetherSF", "GrowSF" and/or "YIMBY" (I used
to volunteer for YIMBY, and before the pandemic regularly attended
TogetherSF/GrowSF events. However after TogetherSF sole endorsed Mark
Farrell, I unsubscribed and stopped attending. Haven't been to any YIMBY
stuff over the last few years but I still get their emails. - PJ)
[ + ] [ ] [ ] Remote public comment at board and committee
meetings
2) Ecological Wisdom: Please outline your view of the major
environmental and ecological issues facing San Francisco and your
proposed policies to address them.
San Francisco's major ecological challenges are climate change,
contaminated land and water, transit emissions, waste, shoreline
resilience, and the need to build a local green economy without repeating
the harms of extraction and displacement. In District 10, that means taking
Hunters Point Naval Shipyard cleanup seriously, investing in urban
reforestation and phytoremediation, expanding clean energy generation and
clean energy manufacturing, and building closed-loop systems for recycling
and materials recovery.
I support phasing out diesel and biodiesel transit, expanding public power,
and building a local/regional clean energy system of Solar, Wind and Tidal
with efficiency, storage, and microgrids that can serve the city more
reliably and cleanly. I also support reducing parking minimums, because San
Francisco should design around transit, walking, biking, and compact
development rather than forcing more car dependence.
In Bayview, Treasure Island, and the waterfront, I support halting any
development that outruns proper cleanup, retesting, and
residential-standard remediation. Environmental justice has to mean that
communities living near polluted land and water are protected first, not
last. Phytoremediation is going to be used significantly by my
administration.
I also support managed retreat where needed, coastal protection, wetland
restoration, and living shoreline strategies that protect habitat and
improve resilience rather than relying only on hard barriers. For me,
environmental policy is not just about preserving nature; it is about
public health, climate resilience, local jobs, and building a more livable
city for working people.
+ - ?
[ + ] [ ] [ ] Phasing out all diesel and biodiesel transit
(e.g., Muni, tour, shuttles)
[ + ] [ ] [ ] Public Power with 100% local/regional clean
energy mandate and elected utility board
[ + ] [ ] [ ] Install local/regional clean energy,
efficiency, and battery storage and microgrids to supply 100% of our
electricity by 2035
[ + ] [ ] [ ] Reducing or eliminating parking minimums in new
housing and commercial developments
[ + ] [ ] [ ] In the Bayview and on Treasure Island, halt all
US Navy land transfers to the city or developers, and halt all development,
until all sites are retested and cleaned to Residential Standards
[ ] [ - ] [ ? ] Non-native Tree Removals (let's plant more
trees, not less? I support Redwood Tree Urban Reforestation, would be nice
to have some Redwood Groves in D10 - PJ)
[ ] [ - ] [ ] Use of herbicides in public parks
[ + ] [ ] [ ? ] Artificial turf on City-owned athletic fields
(although I recognize the heat and plastic issues here, I don't think we
have capacity to maintain natural grass on all the athletic fields. I would
like to see both used. - PJ)
[ + ] [ ] [ ] Managed retreat, Coastal Zone protection, and
restoring wetlands in response to Global Warming
3) Social Justice:
A) What is your assessment of homelessness in San Francisco, and what
solutions do you propose?
Homelessness can be ended if San Francisco is willing to treat it as a
solvable housing and infrastructure problem rather than a permanent service
system. I believe the city has sometimes created incentives for the problem
to persist, and I want a model that moves people into real shelter and
housing quickly, at scale, and with dignity.
My approach would use modular and containerized shelters on land, above
grade, and maritime housing on pontoons or pilings, with rent-capped units
that can scale into the hundreds or thousands. In District 10, I would push
for rapid deployment of roughly 1,000 land-based units and 500 maritime
units along the waterfront and Islais Creek area, with Hunters Point Naval
Shipyard eventually becoming part of a larger strategy to end homelessness
in the district through reactivated land use and public-purpose development.
I also support expanding RV campground-style options and reframing RV
homelessness as urban camping and tourism where appropriate, so that not
every vehicle-based resident is treated only as a problem to be pushed
away. The city should build more humane, practical, and economically
creative solutions that give people a path into shelter, stability, and
eventually permanent housing.
+ - ?
[ + ] [ ] [ ] Homeless Connect
[ ] [ - ] [ ] Care Not Cash (Care AND Cash. Being broke in San
Francisco isn't helping just because you have housing. It only works if
shelter and housing capacity really exists with a living wage. -PJ)
[ + ] [ ] [ ] Healthy SF
[ + ] [ ] [ ] Housing As A Right
[ + ] [ ] [ ] Housing First for Homeless, Addiction, Mental
Health
[ ] [ - ] [ ] Law against sitting or camping on SF sidewalks
[ + ] [ ] [ ] I support more homeless navigation centers in my
district
B) What are your views on housing affordability, what public sector
strategies have worked, which have failed, and what are your proposals?
San Francisco's housing affordability crisis is the result of too little
truly affordable housing, too much speculation, and a long history of
policies that have not produced enough homes for working people, families,
seniors, and low-income residents. Public policy has helped in some areas,
but the city has still failed to match housing need with the level of
production, preservation, and tenant stabilization required.
What has worked best are strategies that create or preserve affordability
directly: affordable housing production, tenant protections, rental
assistance, preservation of existing affordable units, and community
stability investments. The city's Housing Affordability Strategies also
point toward more affordable production, faster permitting, modular and
mass timber approaches, and expanded stabilization tools as part of a
broader solution.
What has failed is overreliance on market-rate development alone, weak
oversight of rental practices, and public policies that allow speculation
to outpace affordability. I do not believe housing should be treated as a
luxury asset class; I support more housing overall, but I want that housing
to be affordable, anti-speculative, and tied to community benefit. I also
want to ban luxury housing developments to prioritize 100% affordable
housing.
+ - ?
[ + ] [ ] [ ] Building more market rate housing will lower
housing costs for current SF residents
[ + ] [ ] [ ] Impacts of all new development should be paid
for in advance by fees on developers
[ + ] [ ] [ ] Community Land Trusts, Housing Co-ops
[ ] [ - ] [ ] Rent Control is too strong
[ ] [ - ] [ ] Waive Environmental Review to build Moderate and
Low Income Housing
[ + ] [ ] [ ] Social Housing (similar to
https://www.sfcommunityhousingact.com/)
[ ] [ - ] [ ] Ban on Airbnb and other short term rentals
[ + ] [ ] [ ] Vacancy tax on residential property and
"pied-a-terre" homes
[ + ] [ ] [ ] Flipping taxes on housing speculation
[ + ] [ ] [ ] 10-year waiting period before corporate and
nonresident owners can sell purchased housing properties
[ +] [ ] [ ] Condo conversion is currently too difficult
4) Nonviolence: What are your solutions for SFPD accountability while
making the streets safer?
I support a public safety model that recruits disciplined service-oriented
people, including military veterans, black belts, and trained martial
artists, especially those who bring cultural traditions of discipline,
protection, and community responsibility. That can include people from
Polynesian, Japanese, Chinese, Korean, Thai, Filipino, and other
warrior-ancestry communities, but the standard should always be training,
judgment, and accountability.
I would like to see more of this talent pathway organized through my
initiative called MACPI-Martial Arts Community Protection Initiative-a
workforce development and youth development pipeline, including
opportunities for unarmed security, neighborhood patrol, school safety,
transit safety, and store-front protection. I also support free martial
arts programming for SFUSD K-12 students and families, because discipline,
confidence, and conflict de-escalation are public-safety investments, not
just recreation.
I would not frame safety around intimidation; I would frame it around
visible protection, prevention, and rapid response. The goal is to make
small crimes far less likely through presence, training, and community
trust, while building a pipeline of future civic leaders, veterans, and
martial artists who can serve San Francisco with honor.
+ - ?
[ ] [ -] [ ] Prioritize SFPD enforcement of moving violations
[ + ] [ ] [ ] Support expansion of foot patrols
[ + ] [ ] [ ] Demand stricter accountability in future MOUs
with the SFPD
[ + ] [ ] [ ] The Board of Supervisors should be able to set
policies and priorities for the SFPD through legislation
[ ] [ - ] [ ] Support a public safety program modeled after
NYC's "Stop and Frisk"
[ +] [ ] [ ] Prosecution of SFPD officers involved in violet
attacks on, and fatal shooting deaths of, SF residents and visitors
[+ ] [ ] [ ] End cash bail for nonviolent crimes
[ + ] [ ] [ ] Cut police funding and increase social program
spending, and establish community control of neighborhood policing
5) Decentralization:
A) What are your thoughts on the Kaufman Charter of 1996? Does it
need revisiting? Would you support replacing the Strong Mayor system
with commissions where the majority of members are appointed by the
Board of Supervisors, or directly elected?
I believe the Kaufman Charter and San Francisco's broader strong-mayor
structure should be revisited, but I would not replace it with a system
that simply concentrates power elsewhere. My preference is for a more
democratic and accountable structure with stronger neighborhood input, more
commission independence, and less top-down control from any single office.
I support elected or Board-accountable commissions where appropriate, but I
also think the design has to protect public participation and prevent
capture by insiders. Any reform should make government more responsive to
residents, not merely more efficient for political elites.
I also do not support recalls except in cases of a crime or a gross ethics
violation. If voters elected someone to a term, they should generally serve
that term unless there is a serious legal or ethical reason to remove them,
because frequent recalls waste money and destabilize government.
+ - ?
[ + ] [ ] [ ] Elected Rent Board
[ + ] [ ] [ ] Elected Public Utility Board
[ + ] [ ] [ ] Bring the Housing Authority under the Board of
Supervisors
[+ ] [ ] [ ] Will you create formal district councils to
advise you?
B) The city currently uses non-profits to provide social services. Do
you think this is an appropriate model? Why or why not?
I think nonprofits can be an appropriate part of the social services model,
but they should not be the whole model or the default substitute for public
responsibility. San Francisco's nonprofit partners do important frontline
work, especially in homelessness, health, food access, and case management,
and many city systems depend on them to reach people the public sector
cannot easily reach on its own.
At the same time, I do not want the city to become permanently dependent on
a fragmented nonprofit ecosystem that can be underfunded, overburdened, and
uneven in quality. The public sector should set clear standards, provide
stable funding, and retain enough direct capacity that essential services
are accountable to the public and not only to contract terms.
My view is that nonprofits should be partners, innovators, and community
anchors, but the City and County of San Francisco should keep strong
in-house authority over policy, oversight, and emergency response. That
gives the city more control, more consistency, and a better ability to
build long-term systems rather than simply outsourcing responsibility.
[ + ] [ ] [ ] Expand Participatory Budgeting to at least 5% of
the District Budget
[ + ] [ ] [ ] Charter amendment allowing voters to choose the
replacement of an elected official being recalled on the same ballot as the
recall vote
[ ] [ - ] [ ] Immediately implement open-source voting system
for SF elections
6) Community Based Economics: What economic policies, including
taxation and land use, would you propose that would drive capital into
our communities and keep that capital here for residents?
San Francisco's economic policy should be built around Ujamaa, or
cooperative economics: keeping wealth circulating inside the community,
supporting local ownership, and making sure residents benefit from the
capital generated in their own neighborhoods. I believe District 10 should
have more room for street vending, neighborhood enterprise, and culturally
rooted small business activity, because that is how communities build
self-sufficiency instead of depending entirely on City Hall grants, RFPs,
or budget cycles.
My policy approach would support local hiring, union jobs, co-ops,
community land ownership, and stronger protection against chain-store and
speculative displacement. I support land use rules and taxation that keep
capital local: commercial vacancy and flipping taxes, stronger support for
neighborhood entrepreneurs, and incentives for businesses that reinvest in
the community instead of extracting from it.
I also support building a more vibrant street vendor culture along 3rd
Street and other district corridors, with African, Black American, Latin
American, and other local cuisines and small businesses able to operate
without unnecessary barriers. The goal is a district economy that is
visibly alive, culturally rooted, and self-sustaining, with more ownership
and less dependence on outside capital.
+ - ?
[ ] [ - ] [ ] Legislation limiting formula retail
outlets/chain stores
[ + ] [ ] [ ] Conditional Use permit required for big box
stores
[ +] [ ] [ ] Municipal broadband as a public utility
[ + ] [ ] [ ] Neighborhood cooperatives prioritized as a
local supply chain for legalized marijuana
[ + ] [ ] [ ] I support recreational marijuana stores opening
in my district
[ + ] [ ] [ ] Local hiring requirements should be enforced
and expanded to include private projects
[ + ] [ ] [ ] Strong preference for union jobs
[ + ] [ ] [ ] Conversion of some golf courses into soccer
fields
[ + ] [ ] [ ] Conversion of some golf courses into wild open
space
[ + ] [ ] [ ? ] Prop 13 limits on tax increases should apply
only to residential properties (and commercial)
[ + ] [ ] [ ] Commercial Rent Control
[ + ] [ ] [ ] Transition all residential and small business
rental
properties into not-for-profit trusts and co-ops
[ + ] [ ] [ ] Vacancy and flipping taxes on local small
business property
[ + ] [ ] [ ] Transaction/Flipping taxes on all asset
speculation to increase city budget
[ + ] [ ] [ ] San Francisco Public Bank by 2027
7) Feminism: Do you believe women are underrepresented in city
government? If so, why do you believe this is the case? Is this a
bad thing, and if so, what would you do to remedy the situation?
Yes, I do believe women are still underrepresented in city government in
important ways, especially in the policy bodies with the biggest influence
and the most consequential budget decisions. San Francisco has made
progress, but the city still has a long way to go before representation is
fully balanced across commissions, committees, and leadership roles.
I think this happens because political power still tends to reward old
boys' networks, time constraints, unequal access to informal
decision-making spaces, and institutional cultures that do not always make
room for women's leadership styles and priorities. It is a bad thing
because a city government that does not reflect the full population is less
legitimate and less effective, and it can miss the needs of women, girls,
and families in policy and budgeting.
To remedy this, I would support stronger gender equity in appointments,
more intentional committee assignments, support for childcare and
reproductive health access, and continued investment in the Department on
the Status of Women and the Women's Agenda. I would also support leadership
pipelines that help women move into boards, commissions, policy roles, and
elected office, while making sure women of color and trans and gender
nonconforming people are not left out of those pathways.
+ - ?
[ + ] [ ] [ ] The City should help SFUSD provide child care
for children of working parents
[ + ] [ ] [ ] The DPH should provide reproductive health
services to both residents and visitors
[ + ] [ ] [ ] Require parental consent for minors seeking an
abortion
[ + ] [ ] [ ] Require parental notification for minors
seeking an abortion
8) Respect for Diversity: Tell us what you believe are the best and the
worst aspects of San Francisco's diversity. How would you try to
protect the best while trying to change the worst?
First of all I'm black and Mexican. Now I would say San Francisco's
diversity is strongest when it shows up as real access, inclusion, and
shared power across languages, cultures, and identities. I would protect
multilingual services, immigrant rights, and trans inclusion, while pushing
back against tokenism, exclusion, and political division.
+ - ?
[ + ] [ ] [ ] Multilingual government and public education
[ + ] [ ] [ ] Undocumented immigrants should have equal access
to education and health care
[ + ] [ ] [ ] Non-citizen residents should be able to vote in
all local elections
[+ ] [ ] [ ] Full rights for transgender and
non-gender-binary persons
[+ ] [ ] [ ] Boards and commissions now reflect the ethnic
diversity of San Francisco
[ + ] [ ] [ ] Boards and commissions now reflect the political
diversity of San Francisco
[ + ] [ ] [ ] My campaign reflects the diversity of San
Francisco
[ ] [ - ] [ ] End Drag Queen Story Hour and K-12 School
Education on Gender Spectrum Differences
9) Global and Personal Responsibility:
A) What should San Francisco government do in response to past ICE
activity in San Francisco, as well as proactive action to prepare for
future ICE activity?
San Francisco should refuse to cooperate with ICE beyond what state and
local law absolutely requires, and it should use every lawful tool
available to protect immigrant residents, families, and due-process rights.
The city should maintain rapid-response legal support, public warnings,
sanctuary enforcement, and clear noncooperation policies for schools,
hospitals, transit, and other public institutions.
For proactive preparation, I support a MACPI-style community protection
framework: trained martial artists, veterans, and disciplined neighborhood
defenders can help create visible, calm, nonviolent presence around
schools, transit stops, courthouses, and community gathering points. The
purpose would not be confrontation, but protection, monitoring,
de-escalation, and rapid communication so communities are not isolated or
surprised when enforcement activity appears.
I would also want the city to expand immigrant legal defense,
know-your-rights education, and coordinated neighborhood alert systems,
while making sure community protection efforts remain lawful and
nonviolent. San Francisco should make it clear that it stands with its
immigrant communities and will not help federal operations that create fear
and family separation.
+ - ?
[ ] [ - ] [ ] City government cooperating with the PATRIOT Act
[ ] [ - ] [ ] City government cooperating with ICE/Secure
Communities
[ + ] [ ] [ ] City government should boycott Israel until it
complies with UN resolutions and international law
[ + ] [ ] [ ] SF supervisors should take a position on
offshore oil drilling outside CA
[ ] [ - ] [ ] SF should refuse to purchase PG&E's nuclear
power ( SF needs to buy out PG&E SF infrastructure entirely, can decide
later what to do with the nuclear energy -PJ)
B) Please describe how you make your political decisions. What is the
main basis for your decision making (e.g., consultation with your
constituents, political consultants, colleagues, unions, businesses,
donors, or your gut feelings)?
I make my political decisions by combining constituent input, community
outreach, policy research, and consultation with subject-matter experts,
including my MPA advisors and other trusted professional colleagues. I also
pay close attention to lived experience in the district, because good
decisions have to be informed by the people who are most affected by them.
I do not want my decisions driven primarily by donors, consultants, or
political insiders. I value expertise, but I think expertise should be
accountable to the public and tested against what residents actually need.
My goal is to use research, public engagement, and practical
problem-solving to arrive at decisions that are both principled and
workable.
Politically, I am independent. I grew up aligned with the Democratic Party,
but after the 2024 cycle I am re-evaluating where I fit because I want a
political home that is consistent about justice, accountability, and human
rights. My decision-making is therefore rooted in values, evidence, and
community responsibility rather than party loyalty for its own sake.
+ - ?
[ + ] [ ] [ ] Fleet Week and the Blue Angels flyover
[ + ] [ ] [ ] JROTC in the public schools
[ ] [ - ] [ ] In a severe recession, environmental
regulations should be suspended to create jobs
[ ] [ - ] [ ] Business taxes are too high
10) Sustainability: What does the Transit First City Charter provision
mean to you? How has Transit First fared in recent years, and how would
you enforce that Charter Provision if elected?
To me, Transit First means San Francisco should design streets and budgets
so that transit, walking, and biking are the default priorities, not
afterthoughts. The Charter says the city should use limited street space to
encourage pedestrians, bicyclists, and public transit, make
transit-priority improvements, and ensure parking policies support
alternative transportation rather than overwhelm it.
In recent years, Transit First has had real wins, but also major gaps. San
Francisco has expanded projects like Muni Forward, transit lanes, and
pedestrian-oriented street changes, yet outside of a few corridors, most
street space still favors cars, which shows the policy is not being fully
enforced citywide.
If elected, I would enforce Transit First by prioritizing dedicated transit
lanes, removing parking or through-traffic where necessary to speed buses
and protect riders, and pushing every department to treat the Charter as an
operating rule rather than a slogan. I would also support stronger parking
management, more weekend and evening transit priority where appropriate,
and corridor-specific plans that make transit faster, safer, and more
reliable in District 10.
+ - ?
[ + ] [ ] [ ] Muni should be funded sufficiently to replace
most car use, and be free to the rider
[ + ] [ ] [ ] Downtown Transit Assessment Tax to support Muni
[+ ] [ ] [ ] Citywide Transit Assessment Tax to support Muni
[ + ] [ ] [ ] Connect Bay Area (https://connectbayarea.com)
[ ] [ - ] [ ] More weekend closures of streets in/near my
district to cars (e.g., Car-Free GGP) (can't afford street closures in lieu
of T line suspension and Islais Creek bridge closure -PJ)
[ + ] [ ] [ ] State law change that lets bicycles treat stop
signs as yield signs and red lights as stop signs
[ + ] [ ] [ ] I ride Muni, bicycle and/or walk instead of
driving on a regular basis
[ + ] [ ] [ ] Bus Rapid Transit expanded to all major transit
corridors in SF
[ + ] [ ] [ ] Car hailing services like Uber and Lyft should
be regulated as taxis, or banned
[ ] [ - ] [ ] Scooter/similar vehicle rentals should be
required to store vehicles on private property
[ + ] [ ] [ ] Allow residents to park on the sidewalk without
getting a ticket, unless their neighbors complain
[ ] [ - ] [ ] Congestion pricing for parking
[ + ] [ ] [ ] Power more City vehicles using biofuels (e.g.,
corn-based ethanol)
[ + ] [ ] [ ] Residents should be allowed to park in the
street in front of their own driveway for free
[ ] [ - ] [ ] Support expanding parking meter hours to
include later evening hours and weekends
[ ] [ - ] [ ] Remove parking spots and car lanes to create
dedicated bike and bus lanes or wider sidewalks
Your positions (at the time) on selected current and past Propositions
(skip any for which you didn't live or vote in SF, or didn't take
a position at the time):
+ - ?
[ + ] [ ] [ ] June 2026 Prop D (Overpaid CEO Tax)
[ ] [ - ] [ ] Nov 2024 Prop D (Stronger Mayor)
[ + ] [ ] [ ] Nov 2024 Prop K (Great Highway)
[ + ] [ ] [ ] Nov 2024 Prop L (Tax Uber and Waymo to fund
Muni)
[ ] [ - ] [ ] Nov 2024 Prop M (Block Prop L)
[ ] [ - ] [ ] March 2024 Prop E (More Police Chases)
[ ] [ - ] [ ] March 2024 Prop F (Drug Test Poor People)
[ + ] [ ] [ ] June 2022 Prop C (Recall Reform)
[ ] [ - ] [ ] June 2022 Prop H (Boudin Recall)
[ + ] [ ] [ ] Nov 2020 Prop G (16-17 y.o. voting, local
elections)
[ + ] [ ] [ ] Nov 2020 Prop I (Real Estate Transfer Tax)
Due Date: Sat, July 11, 11:59 pm